AI-Driven Record Review
for Mental Health Professionals
When the court appoints you, you’re the neutral, and both sides have reason to find the hole in your evaluation. Saxon turns years of records across every household into one chronology and a defensible first draft, with every finding tied back to the page it came from.
Why Mental Health Professionals Use Saxon
Custody evaluations, parenting assessments, and the forensic work that gets tested from both directions at once.
One chronology across every household
School records, therapy notes, prior evaluations, police and CPS reports, often spanning multiple children and two homes, organized into a single timeline. You stop building the file by hand and start reading it.
Show your review was even-handed
The hardest question in a custody evaluation usually isn’t whether a fact is right. It’s why you credited one parent’s account over the other’s. Every finding ties back to its source, so you can show what you reviewed from each household.
Still defensible months from now
Scrutiny arrives long after the report is filed: a post-judgment motion, an appeal, a licensing complaint. Saxon keeps the record trail intact, so you can reconstruct how you reached a conclusion once the file has gone cold.
The Whole Evaluation
From Record to Recommendation
Record Review
Saxon organizes every source into one chronology and flags where the accounts diverge, whether that’s an allegation with no record behind it or a gap where documentation should exist and doesn’t.
Report and Recommendation
Saxon organizes your findings into court-ready sections in your own report format, so the analysis holds together from background through recommendation.
Testimony Prep
Saxon anticipates the questioning both parties’ counsel are likely to bring, including where your review could be made to look uneven, and stress-tests your recommendation before you testify.
When The Two Accounts Don’t Match.
Most of an evaluation goes into working out which version the record actually supports. Saxon lays the accounts against the documents and shows you where they part ways.
Show What You Reviewed, And What You Didn’t
Saxon drafts. You approve. Every finding ties back to the page it came from, across every source and both households, so you can demonstrate an even review rather than assert one. Nothing is filed without you.
Saxon is SOC 2 Type II audited and HIPAA compliant, and it meets GDPR requirements. Your records stay isolated to your practice and are never used to train outside models.
Bring a file.
See what Saxon finds before you write the recommendation.
You’ll see the chronology, the flagged discrepancies, and the first draft, built from your own record set.
Questions and Answers
My work gets tested by both sides, not just one. Does Saxon account for that?
Yes. Both parties’ counsel have reason to challenge your methodology and your record review. Saxon ties every finding back to the specific page it came from, so you can answer where a fact originated no matter which side is asking.
What happens when I’m accused of favoring one parent?
Bias challenges come down to what you reviewed and how much weight you gave it. Saxon documents the source list for each household and where every finding originated, so the record of your review speaks for itself instead of resting on your recollection months later.
The two households give me contradictory accounts. Can Saxon help sort that out?
Yes. Saxon builds one chronology from every source and flags where the accounts diverge from the documentation. What the discrepancies mean is your call.