The inputs get examined, not just the total
Wage records, tax documents, employment files, vocational testing and medical restrictions each become their own line of questioning. Every one needs a source.
← All expert witness disciplines
Saxon™ for vocational and economic damages
Show your work, because you will be asked to.
Earning-capacity and future-damages testimony is drawing closer scrutiny, and part of that scrutiny is now about the tools in the workflow rather than the numbers alone. Saxon keeps every record-based input traceable to the page it came from, so the method behind your opinion is something you can show rather than describe.
A shifting disclosure environment.
Courts and rulemakers are actively working through how AI-assisted analysis should be disclosed and tested. That lands on this discipline sooner than most.
Software in the workflow is now a question
Experts in this area increasingly use software in their own modeling, which makes how it was used a fair subject for cross-examination.
Reconstructing the method later is hard
An opinion formed months ago has to be explained from memory unless the trail was kept as the work was done.
How Saxon supports a damages engagement.
Transparency by construction: the record, the citation, and the review step are the same object.
-
Stage 01
Inventory the file
Employment records, wage and tax documentation, vocational testing, medical restrictions and deposition testimony catalogued in one matter, with duplicates identified and missing documents flagged.
-
Stage 02
Cite every record-based input
Each figure or restriction Saxon surfaces links back to the document and page it was drawn from, so an input can be verified rather than recalled.
-
Stage 03
Keep the method visible
Playbooks record the sequence of steps applied to the file, so the research path behind a comparison or a benchmark is documented as the work happens, not reconstructed afterwards.
-
Stage 04
Audit before submission
Saxon checks the draft against the record, flags conclusions the file does not support, and anticipates the lines of inquiry a damages opinion attracts.
Saxon drafts; you approve. Every finding stays tied to the page it came from, and nothing is filed or sent without you. Privacy and security controls for sensitive expert and medical records are documented in our Trust Center.
Questions damages experts ask first.
If yours is not here, bring it to the demo and we will answer it against your own file.
Does Saxon calculate damages?
No. Saxon does not model, project or compute a damages figure. It organizes and cites the record those calculations rest on, and flags what the record does not support.
How does this help with disclosure questions?
Because every record-based input is source-linked and the steps applied are recorded, the path from document to opinion is documented and reviewable. What is disclosable in a given matter remains a question for you and counsel.
Who decides what goes in the report?
You do. Saxon drafts and audits; nothing is filed, sent or adopted without your review and approval.
Can our whole practice work this way?
Yes. Playbooks are configured per practice, so associates and analysts run the same documented sequence rather than each keeping their own method.
Bring one damages file. See the trail it leaves behind.
Book a DemoWe will run a real record set through the four stages and show you the cited inputs, the documented steps, and the audit pass.