A transparent planning tool
Legal AI Time Savings Calculator
Model a workflow with your own caseload, current effort, cost, and estimated improvement range. The calculator adds no FasterOutcomes performance assumption.
First compare the operating approachesYour baseline, your range
Model one repeatable legal workflow.
The fields begin with example inputs so you can see how the model works. Example inputs are not benchmarks—replace them with your actual baseline and your own estimates.
Every formula, visible
How the scenario is calculated.
Current monthly hours = matters per month × current hands-on hours per matter
Current monthly cost basis = current monthly hours × loaded hourly cost
Hours returned = current monthly hours × estimated reduction
Scenario value = hours returned × loaded hourly cost
Capacity-equivalent matters = hours returned ÷ current hours per matter
Build a defensible baseline
Measure the work before estimating improvement.
Choose a bounded workflow: intake qualification, financial disclosure review, record inventory, chronology preparation, report self-audit, or another repeatable sequence. Track hands-on time across representative matters and include rework after professional review.
For family-law work, separate administrative preparation from attorney judgment. For custody evaluations, include record collection, source review, report preparation, and the qualified evaluator’s final review as distinct stages.
Use a low and high estimate because matter complexity and adoption vary. Re-run the model after a controlled pilot using measured results—not a generic industry percentage.
Value is more than subtraction
Account for setup, review, and exceptions.
A useful business case includes the time required to map the workflow, prepare source material, configure permissions, train the team, review output, resolve exceptions, and maintain the process. It also names the professional responsible for approving what moves forward.
Compare the operating approaches in the legal AI workflow buyer guide, review current controls in the Trust Center, and see one documented evaluator workflow in Dr. Sandra Roland’s case study.
Test the scenario
Bring the workflow and the numbers behind it.
A guided demo can use your practice area, baseline, systems, review points, and exceptions to determine whether a pilot is worth designing.